The plaintiffs alleged that the products labeling was uniform, justifying the inference that they saw the claims, and they also alleged the existence of a study showing that smokers
Any assumed disclosure could cure deception with a simple explanation that the inherently misleading speech is a lie. [Again, both a good point about the unworkability of the current inherently misleading test under First Amendment doctrine and a good demonstration that the test isnt set up to judge tort claims.] However, the rest of the Central Hudson test can also be skipped, and the speech at issue banned outright, if the speech is in fact, misleading. The standard here is not that of a reasonable consumer, but a subjective standard
Looking in more detail, relatively low shares of women having completed at most lower secondary education were daily smokers in Cyprus, Bulgaria, Greece and Croatia for women, at least 5.0 percentage points lower than for women in either of the other education categories shown in Table 3
Nicotine in Vapes vs
It's life experience and it's the roles you choose
It can result in permanent scarring in patients lungs with symptoms such as breathing difficulties and chronic coughing
