In denying an appeal in federal district court, a judge concurred with an Arkansas supreme-court ruling that since the expert proof is in sharp conflict, Hartjes ruling, by the protocols of legal procedure, could not be held clearly erroneous, and therefore his decision that Rector was competent to be tried and executed was entitled to a presumption of correctness, in accordance with a Supreme Court instruction in 1981 that factual determinations by lower courts are due a high measure of deference. Thus the matter of Rectors actual competence for execution was progressively abstracted into merely a paper matter of the competence of the process and of which standards should be applied to his case
Helmi et al
Melt em all down, turn em into sculptures
Remodeled everything with nicer code
In a movie that clearly seemed to be aimed at a young audience, was it morally offensive, I wondered, to portray a guy happily dressed as a pack of cigarettes
TIM DILLON: By bad decisions, by everything