Responding to the decision, public health expert Clive Bates wrote on Twitter, The idea that dramatically reduced exposure to toxins does not translate to reduced risk to health requires a novel and implausible theory of the human body. One TPSAC member, no doubt inadvertently, summed up committees attitude when he said: I think this stuff is just too complicated for the average Joe. Though TPSACs decision is not binding on FDA, it is symptomatic of how difficult it is for companies to convince regulators to allow them to tell consumers the most important facts about their reduced risk products, chiefly that they are safer than cigarettes
E-cigarettes like Juuls are still a recent invention, and their long-term health effects remain largely unknown
Read more: Air Freshener for Smokers: Eliminate Smoke Odors Instantly Best Selling Smoke Eliminator Sprays for Cars Tired of dragging around the scent of smoke all day after a break
Although smokers who cut back take in less smoke and nicotine, their bodies are still unable to heal completely from the ongoing intake of toxins
Anyway, I thoroughly enjoyed this one
There is a subjective component because they are not based on numbers and they can turn out to be a mess. Thats why they added the word characterizing, Davoli added